diff options
| author | Franck Cuny <franck.cuny@gmail.com> | 2016-08-10 14:33:04 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Franck Cuny <franck.cuny@gmail.com> | 2016-08-10 20:17:56 -0700 |
| commit | 8d7d02f42c3947f756c18cb4d37d9d97fbd0d27d (patch) | |
| tree | a6cecddaaea7e87d901a6c28bebe3a531438f24b /posts/2014-08-08-google-is-using-https-as-a-ranking-signal.md | |
| parent | Merge branch 'convert-to-org' (diff) | |
| download | lumberjaph-8d7d02f42c3947f756c18cb4d37d9d97fbd0d27d.tar.gz | |
convert back to md
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | posts/2014-08-08-google-is-using-https-as-a-ranking-signal.md | 39 |
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/posts/2014-08-08-google-is-using-https-as-a-ranking-signal.md b/posts/2014-08-08-google-is-using-https-as-a-ranking-signal.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bb17069 --- /dev/null +++ b/posts/2014-08-08-google-is-using-https-as-a-ranking-signal.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +Earlier this week Google has announced that they will use HTTPS as a ranking signal for the [Page Rank](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_rank). + + <center> + + <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"> + + <p> + +HTTPS is now a lightweight ranking signal: <http://t.co/hOr1DS9trV>. Secure those sites! \#WebmasterNews pic.twitter.com/qk9v9L8lvR + + </p> + +--- Google Webmasters (@googlewmc) August 7, 2014 + + </blockquote> + + </center> + + <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> + +A lot of people on Hacker News and Twitter were annoyed (even upstet for some) by that decision. I understand some of the concern, but I don't think they are legitimate: + +- Yes, most SSL certs are not free. But hosting a website has also a cost. + +- However, certificates are not always expensive. You can get one for $16 with [Gandi](https://www.gandi.net/ssl). + +- Yes, there is probably additional cost. You'll need the technical knowledge on how to set up the certificate. But it's the same for running a web site. If you don't know how to do it, you'll need someone to do it for you. + +- There's an opportunity for hosting companies to compete on this, and make it easier and cheaper for small business and individual to run a web site with TLS. + +- The Page Rank is already secret, no one know how important having TLS will impact the ranking. + +- Yes, it matters even for a "content only" site. How can you trust the content was not altered otherwise ? + +- This decision impact business more than anyone else. If you're worried that your own personal blog is going to be impacted, I don't want to be mean, but I doubt this will have a huge impact for you. + +- Google won't stop ranking you because you don't have TLS. + +I really believe this is a first small step in the right direction. Plain HTTP should die at this point. |
