diff options
| author | Franck Cuny <franck.cuny@gmail.com> | 2016-08-10 14:33:04 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Franck Cuny <franck.cuny@gmail.com> | 2016-08-10 20:17:56 -0700 |
| commit | 8d7d02f42c3947f756c18cb4d37d9d97fbd0d27d (patch) | |
| tree | a6cecddaaea7e87d901a6c28bebe3a531438f24b /posts/2014-08-08-google-is-using-https-as-a-ranking-signal.org | |
| parent | Merge branch 'convert-to-org' (diff) | |
| download | lumberjaph-8d7d02f42c3947f756c18cb4d37d9d97fbd0d27d.tar.gz | |
convert back to md
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | posts/2014-08-08-google-is-using-https-as-a-ranking-signal.org | 70 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 70 deletions
diff --git a/posts/2014-08-08-google-is-using-https-as-a-ranking-signal.org b/posts/2014-08-08-google-is-using-https-as-a-ranking-signal.org deleted file mode 100644 index dfcfe5f..0000000 --- a/posts/2014-08-08-google-is-using-https-as-a-ranking-signal.org +++ /dev/null @@ -1,70 +0,0 @@ -Earlier this week Google has announced that they will use HTTPS as a -ranking signal for the [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_rank][Page -Rank]]. - -#+BEGIN_HTML - <center> -#+END_HTML - -#+BEGIN_HTML - <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"> -#+END_HTML - -#+BEGIN_HTML - <p> -#+END_HTML - -HTTPS is now a lightweight ranking signal: http://t.co/hOr1DS9trV. -Secure those sites! #WebmasterNews pic.twitter.com/qk9v9L8lvR - -#+BEGIN_HTML - </p> -#+END_HTML - ---- Google Webmasters (@googlewmc) August 7, 2014 - -#+BEGIN_HTML - </blockquote> -#+END_HTML - -#+BEGIN_HTML - </center> -#+END_HTML - -#+BEGIN_HTML - <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> -#+END_HTML - -A lot of people on Hacker News and Twitter were annoyed (even upstet for -some) by that decision. I understand some of the concern, but I don't -think they are legitimate: - -- Yes, most SSL certs are not free. But hosting a website has also a - cost. - -- However, certificates are not always expensive. You can get one for - $16 with [[https://www.gandi.net/ssl][Gandi]]. - -- Yes, there is probably additional cost. You'll need the technical - knowledge on how to set up the certificate. But it's the same for - running a web site. If you don't know how to do it, you'll need - someone to do it for you. - -- There's an opportunity for hosting companies to compete on this, and - make it easier and cheaper for small business and individual to run a - web site with TLS. - -- The Page Rank is already secret, no one know how important having TLS - will impact the ranking. - -- Yes, it matters even for a "content only" site. How can you trust the - content was not altered otherwise ? - -- This decision impact business more than anyone else. If you're - worried that your own personal blog is going to be impacted, I don't - want to be mean, but I doubt this will have a huge impact for you. - -- Google won't stop ranking you because you don't have TLS. - -I really believe this is a first small step in the right direction. -Plain HTTP should die at this point. |
