diff options
| author | Franck Cuny <franckcuny@gmail.com> | 2016-08-04 11:45:44 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Franck Cuny <franckcuny@gmail.com> | 2016-08-04 11:45:44 -0700 |
| commit | 585b48b6a605cb71ef99dd767880e1b7ee5bf24e (patch) | |
| tree | c65377350d12bd1e62e0bdd58458c1044541c27b /posts/2014-08-08-google-is-using-https-as-a-ranking-signal.org | |
| parent | Use Bullet list for the index. (diff) | |
| parent | Mass convert all posts from markdown to org. (diff) | |
| download | lumberjaph-585b48b6a605cb71ef99dd767880e1b7ee5bf24e.tar.gz | |
Merge branch 'convert-to-org'
Diffstat (limited to 'posts/2014-08-08-google-is-using-https-as-a-ranking-signal.org')
| -rw-r--r-- | posts/2014-08-08-google-is-using-https-as-a-ranking-signal.org | 70 |
1 files changed, 70 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/posts/2014-08-08-google-is-using-https-as-a-ranking-signal.org b/posts/2014-08-08-google-is-using-https-as-a-ranking-signal.org new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dfcfe5f --- /dev/null +++ b/posts/2014-08-08-google-is-using-https-as-a-ranking-signal.org @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ +Earlier this week Google has announced that they will use HTTPS as a +ranking signal for the [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_rank][Page +Rank]]. + +#+BEGIN_HTML + <center> +#+END_HTML + +#+BEGIN_HTML + <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"> +#+END_HTML + +#+BEGIN_HTML + <p> +#+END_HTML + +HTTPS is now a lightweight ranking signal: http://t.co/hOr1DS9trV. +Secure those sites! #WebmasterNews pic.twitter.com/qk9v9L8lvR + +#+BEGIN_HTML + </p> +#+END_HTML + +--- Google Webmasters (@googlewmc) August 7, 2014 + +#+BEGIN_HTML + </blockquote> +#+END_HTML + +#+BEGIN_HTML + </center> +#+END_HTML + +#+BEGIN_HTML + <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> +#+END_HTML + +A lot of people on Hacker News and Twitter were annoyed (even upstet for +some) by that decision. I understand some of the concern, but I don't +think they are legitimate: + +- Yes, most SSL certs are not free. But hosting a website has also a + cost. + +- However, certificates are not always expensive. You can get one for + $16 with [[https://www.gandi.net/ssl][Gandi]]. + +- Yes, there is probably additional cost. You'll need the technical + knowledge on how to set up the certificate. But it's the same for + running a web site. If you don't know how to do it, you'll need + someone to do it for you. + +- There's an opportunity for hosting companies to compete on this, and + make it easier and cheaper for small business and individual to run a + web site with TLS. + +- The Page Rank is already secret, no one know how important having TLS + will impact the ranking. + +- Yes, it matters even for a "content only" site. How can you trust the + content was not altered otherwise ? + +- This decision impact business more than anyone else. If you're + worried that your own personal blog is going to be impacted, I don't + want to be mean, but I doubt this will have a huge impact for you. + +- Google won't stop ranking you because you don't have TLS. + +I really believe this is a first small step in the right direction. +Plain HTTP should die at this point. |
