diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | posts/2013-01-14-where-im-excited-about-a-keyboard.md (renamed from content/post/2013-01-14-where-im-excited-about-a-keyboard.md) | 5 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/content/post/2013-01-14-where-im-excited-about-a-keyboard.md b/posts/2013-01-14-where-im-excited-about-a-keyboard.md index ed77103..6efe33b 100644 --- a/content/post/2013-01-14-where-im-excited-about-a-keyboard.md +++ b/posts/2013-01-14-where-im-excited-about-a-keyboard.md @@ -1,8 +1,3 @@ ---- -date: 2013-01-14T00:00:00Z -title: Where I'm excited about a keyboard ---- - One thing that I always find fascinating is how an object, or a way of thinking, was modeled 25, 50 or 100 years ago, and how we keep going on with the same design without trying to think if it's actually the right one, or to challenge our way of thinking with a different one. Keyboards are one of those things. We all know the [origin](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qwerty) of the QWERTY layout, why the keyboard has this shape, and so on (the [wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_keyboard) page is a good read). Let's take a look at this tweet from [Technomancy](http://technomancy.us) (who, for the the record, also has some [interesting](http://www.flickr.com/photos/technomancy/4397554484/) keyboard ideas :) <blockquote class="twitter-tweet tw-align-center"><p>I wonder how long it'll be before we can look back and laugh at the idea of poking a QWERTY soft-keyboard on a touch screen. Hope it's soon.</p>— Phil Hagelberg (@technomancy) <a href="https://twitter.com/technomancy/status/290959908302647296" data-datetime="2013-01-14T23:13:42+00:00">January 14, 2013</a></blockquote> |