summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/posts/2013-01-14-where-im-excited-about-a-keyboard.org
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'posts/2013-01-14-where-im-excited-about-a-keyboard.org')
-rw-r--r--posts/2013-01-14-where-im-excited-about-a-keyboard.org82
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 82 deletions
diff --git a/posts/2013-01-14-where-im-excited-about-a-keyboard.org b/posts/2013-01-14-where-im-excited-about-a-keyboard.org
deleted file mode 100644
index cfe4137..0000000
--- a/posts/2013-01-14-where-im-excited-about-a-keyboard.org
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,82 +0,0 @@
-One thing that I always find fascinating is how an object, or a way of
-thinking, was modeled 25, 50 or 100 years ago, and how we keep going on
-with the same design without trying to think if it's actually the right
-one, or to challenge our way of thinking with a different one. Keyboards
-are one of those things. We all know the
-[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qwerty][origin]] of the QWERTY layout,
-why the keyboard has this shape, and so on (the
-[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_keyboard][wikipedia]] page is a
-good read). Let's take a look at this tweet from
-[[http://technomancy.us][Technomancy]] (who, for the the record, also
-has some
-[[http://www.flickr.com/photos/technomancy/4397554484/][interesting]]
-keyboard ideas :)
-
-#+BEGIN_HTML
- <blockquote class="twitter-tweet tw-align-center">
-#+END_HTML
-
-#+BEGIN_HTML
- <p>
-#+END_HTML
-
-I wonder how long it'll be before we can look back and laugh at the idea
-of poking a QWERTY soft-keyboard on a touch screen. Hope it's soon.
-
-#+BEGIN_HTML
- </p>
-#+END_HTML
-
---- Phil Hagelberg (@technomancy) January 14, 2013
-
-#+BEGIN_HTML
- </blockquote>
-#+END_HTML
-
-#+BEGIN_HTML
- <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
-#+END_HTML
-
-That's exactly what I'm talking about: we keep reproducing the same
-design without questioning it's benefits (I've no doubt that people at
-Apple and Google have tried a lot of alternatives, an they probably
-decided to stick to this one because it's the most common and people are
-used to it. Still, it doesn't mean we have to stick with it). But even
-for physical keyboard, we keep the same design: a large space key (why
-?!), a capslock key (who need that one, even remapped to "control" I
-feel like it's a bad place to physically put a key on the keyboard),
-large enter/shift keys, etc.
-
-I'm not a keyboard nerd. But sometimes I take a look at some new and
-strange models, sometimes I try one of them, and I might even buy one,
-like the [[http://www.typematrix.com][TypeMatrix]] (that one I really
-liked).
-
-So, when [[https://twitter.com/obra][Jesse]] announced that he was
-working on a keyboard, I got /really/ excited. His layout is very
-interesting (it seems to be inspired by the kinesis), and the shape is
-also innovative. I also remember reading that he suffers from RSI, which
-mean it's something he will be careful bout. Take a look at the mapping:
-there's only 52 keys, control/shift/alt are repeated, but with this
-shape it makes sense, since they're dedicated to one half of the
-keyboard.
-
-#+BEGIN_HTML
- <center>
-#+END_HTML
-
-#+BEGIN_HTML
- </center>
-#+END_HTML
-
-You can
-[[http://blog.fsck.com/2012/12/building-a-keyboard-part-1.html][read]]
-[[http://blog.fsck.com/2012/12/building-a-keyboard-part-2.html][about]]
-[[http://blog.fsck.com/2013/01/a-pound-of-sculpey.html][his]]
-[[http://blog.fsck.com/2013/01/pinkies-and-your-brain.html][progress]].
-He's also publishing [[http://www.flickr.com/photos/obra/][pictures]] on
-his flickr account.
-
-I really hope he will be able to build this keyboard and manage to
-manufacture it (maybe a kickstarter project ?). I'll definitely be in
-line to get one.