From c33adbf475ea28459e1c9a9fdc826e3ccaec5c87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: franck cuny <franck@lumberjaph.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:05:09 +0200
Subject: fix link

---
 _posts/2010-10-20-spore-update.textile | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to '_posts/2010-10-20-spore-update.textile')

diff --git a/_posts/2010-10-20-spore-update.textile b/_posts/2010-10-20-spore-update.textile
index 73ff317..3806f73 100644
--- a/_posts/2010-10-20-spore-update.textile
+++ b/_posts/2010-10-20-spore-update.textile
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ layout: post
 category: misc
 ---
 
-As I've said "in my OSDC report":http://lumberjaph.net/conference/2010/10/12/osdcfr.html, after I "presented SPORE":http://www.slideshare.net/franckcuny/spore I've had some positive feedback. In the last ten days, I've created a "google group":http://groups.google.com/group/spre-rest to discuss the current specification and implementations, a "SPORE account on github":http://github.com/SPORE to hold the implementation specifications and the API descriptions files, and more importantly, we have some new implementations:
+As I've said "in my OSDC report":http://lumberjaph.net/conference/2010/10/12/osdcfr.html, after I "presented SPORE":http://www.slideshare.net/franckcuny/spore I've had some positive feedback. In the last ten days, I've created a "google group":http://groups.google.com/group/spore-rest to discuss the current specification and implementations, a "SPORE account on github":http://github.com/SPORE to hold the implementation specifications and the API descriptions files, and more importantly, we have some new implementations: 
 
  * "Ruby":http://github.com/sukria/Ruby-Spore
  * "node.js":http://github.com/francois2metz/node-spore
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

