From c33adbf475ea28459e1c9a9fdc826e3ccaec5c87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: franck cuny Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:05:09 +0200 Subject: fix link --- _posts/2010-10-20-spore-update.textile | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to '_posts/2010-10-20-spore-update.textile') diff --git a/_posts/2010-10-20-spore-update.textile b/_posts/2010-10-20-spore-update.textile index 73ff317..3806f73 100644 --- a/_posts/2010-10-20-spore-update.textile +++ b/_posts/2010-10-20-spore-update.textile @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ layout: post category: misc --- -As I've said "in my OSDC report":http://lumberjaph.net/conference/2010/10/12/osdcfr.html, after I "presented SPORE":http://www.slideshare.net/franckcuny/spore I've had some positive feedback. In the last ten days, I've created a "google group":http://groups.google.com/group/spre-rest to discuss the current specification and implementations, a "SPORE account on github":http://github.com/SPORE to hold the implementation specifications and the API descriptions files, and more importantly, we have some new implementations: +As I've said "in my OSDC report":http://lumberjaph.net/conference/2010/10/12/osdcfr.html, after I "presented SPORE":http://www.slideshare.net/franckcuny/spore I've had some positive feedback. In the last ten days, I've created a "google group":http://groups.google.com/group/spore-rest to discuss the current specification and implementations, a "SPORE account on github":http://github.com/SPORE to hold the implementation specifications and the API descriptions files, and more importantly, we have some new implementations: * "Ruby":http://github.com/sukria/Ruby-Spore * "node.js":http://github.com/francois2metz/node-spore -- cgit v1.2.3