Earlier this week Google has announced that they will use HTTPS as a
ranking signal for the [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_rank][Page
Rank]].
#+BEGIN_HTML
#+END_HTML
#+BEGIN_HTML
#+END_HTML
#+BEGIN_HTML
#+END_HTML
#+BEGIN_HTML
#+END_HTML
A lot of people on Hacker News and Twitter were annoyed (even upstet for
some) by that decision. I understand some of the concern, but I don't
think they are legitimate:
- Yes, most SSL certs are not free. But hosting a website has also a
cost.
- However, certificates are not always expensive. You can get one for
$16 with [[https://www.gandi.net/ssl][Gandi]].
- Yes, there is probably additional cost. You'll need the technical
knowledge on how to set up the certificate. But it's the same for
running a web site. If you don't know how to do it, you'll need
someone to do it for you.
- There's an opportunity for hosting companies to compete on this, and
make it easier and cheaper for small business and individual to run a
web site with TLS.
- The Page Rank is already secret, no one know how important having TLS
will impact the ranking.
- Yes, it matters even for a "content only" site. How can you trust the
content was not altered otherwise ?
- This decision impact business more than anyone else. If you're
worried that your own personal blog is going to be impacted, I don't
want to be mean, but I doubt this will have a huge impact for you.
- Google won't stop ranking you because you don't have TLS.
I really believe this is a first small step in the right direction.
Plain HTTP should die at this point.