1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
|
As I've said [in my OSDC report](http://lumberjaph.net/conference/2010/10/12/osdcfr.html), after I [presented SPORE](http://www.slideshare.net/franckcuny/spore) I've had some positive feedback. In the last ten days, I've created a [google group](http://groups.google.com/group/spore-rest) to discuss the current specification and implementations, a [SPORE account on github](http://github.com/SPORE) to hold the implementation specifications and the API descriptions files, and more importantly, we have some new implementations:
- [Ruby](http://github.com/sukria/Ruby-Spore)
- [node.js](http://github.com/francois2metz/node-spore)
- [Javascript](http://github.com/nikopol/jquery-spore) (client side)
- PHP (not published yet)
in addition to the already existing implementations:
- [Perl](http://github.com/franckcuny/net-http-spore)
- [Lua](http://github.com/fperrad/lua-Spore)
- [Clojure](http://github.com/ngrunwald/clj-spore)
- [Python](http://github.com/elishowk/pyspore)
In this post, I'll try to show some common usages for SPORE, in order to give a better explanation of why I think it's needed.
## Consistency
``` lua
require 'Spore'
local github = Spore.new_from_spec 'github.json'
github:enable 'Format.JSON'
github:enable 'Runtime'
local r = github:user_information{format = 'json', username = 'schacon'}
print(r.status) --> 200
print(r.headers['x-runtime']) --> 126ms
print(r.body.user.name) --> Scott Chacon
```
``` perl
use Net::HTTP::Spore;
my $gh = Net::HTTP::Spore->new_from_spec('github.json');
$gh->enable('Format::JSON');
$gh->enable('Runtime');
my $r= $gh->user_information( format => 'json', username => 'schacon' );
say "HTTP status => ".$r->status; # 200
say "Runtime => ".$r->header('X-Spore-Runtime'); # 128ms
say "username => ".$r->body->{user}->{name}; # Scott Chacon
```
``` ruby
require 'spore'
gh = Spore.new(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'github.json'))
gh.enable(Spore::Middleware::Runtime) # will add a header with runtime
gh.enable(Spore::Middleware::Format::JSON) # will deserialize JSON responses
# API call
r = gh.user_information( :format => 'json', :username => 'schacon' )
puts "HTTP status => ".r.code # 200
puts "Runtime => ".r.header('X-Spore-Runtime') # 128ms
puts "username => ".r.body['user']['name'] # Scott Chacon
```
As you can see in the previous example, I do the same request on the GitHub API: fetch informations from the user "mojombo". In the three languages, the API for the client is the same:
- you create a client using the github.json API description
- you enable some middlewares
- you execute your request: the method name is the same, the argument names are the same!
- you manipulate the result the same way
## Easy to switch from a language to another
You can switch from a language to another without any surprises. If you must provide an API client to a third-party, you don't have to care about what languages they use, you only need to provide a description. Your methods call will be the same between all the languages, so it's easy to switch between languages, without the need to chose an appropriate client for your API (if one exists), to read the documentation (when there is one), and having the client implementation going in your way.
## Better maintanability
What annoys me the most when I want to use an API, is that I have to choose between two, three, or more clients that will communicate with this API. I need to read the documentations, the code, and test thoses implementations to decide which one will best fit my needs, and won't go in my way. And what if I need to do caching before the content is deserialized ? And what if the remote API changes it's authentication method (like twitter, from basic auth to OAuth) and the maintainer of the client doesn't update the code ?
With SPORE, you don't have to maintain a client, only a description file. Your API changes, all you have to do is to update your description, and all the clients, using any language, will be able to use your new API, without the need to release a new client specific for this API in javascript, Perl, Ruby, ...
## Easy to use with APIs that are compatible
If you want to use the Twitter public timeline:
``` perl
use Net::HTTP::Spore;
my $client = Net::HTTP::Spore->new_from_spec('twitter.json');
$client->enable('Format::JSON');
my $r = $client->public_timeline( format => 'json' );
foreach my $t ( @{ $r->body } ) {
my $username = Encode::encode_utf8( $t->{user}->{name} );
my $text = Encode::encode_utf8( $t->{text} );
say $username . " says " . $text;
}
```
And now on statusnet:
``` perl
use Net::HTTP::Spore;
my $client = Net::HTTP::Spore->new_from_spec(
'twitter.json',
base_url => 'http://identi.ca/api'
);
$client->enable('Format::JSON');
my $r = $client->public_timeline( format => 'json' );
foreach my $t ( @{ $r->body } ) {
my $username = Encode::encode_utf8( $t->{user}->{name} );
my $text = Encode::encode_utf8( $t->{text} );
say $username . " says " . $text;
}
```
easy, right ? As both APIs are compatible, the only thing you need to do is change the argument **base\_url** when you create your new client.
## It's easy to write a description
It's really easy to write a description for your API. Let's take a look at the one for github:
``` json
{
"base_url" : "http://github.com/api/v2/",
"version" : "0.2",
"methods" : {
"follow" : {
"required_params" : [
"user",
"format"
],
"path" : "/:format/user/follow/:user",
"method" : "POST",
"authentication" : true
}
},
"name" : "GitHub",
"authority" : "GITHUB:franckcuny",
"meta" : {
"documentation" : "http://develop.github.com/"
}
}
```
The important parts are the basic API description (with a name, a base url for the API) and the list of available methods (here I've only put the 'follow' method).
More descriptions are available on [GitHub](http://github.com/SPORE/api-description), as well as and the [full specification](http://github.com/SPORE/specifications/blob/master/spore_description.pod).
We also have [a schema](http://github.com/SPORE/specifications/blob/master/spore_validation.rx) to validate your descriptions.
## Middlewares
By default, your SPORE client will only do a request and return a result. But it's easy to alter the default behavior with various middlewares. The most obvious one is the deserialization for a response, like the previous example with github and the middleware Format::JSON.
## Control your workflow
The use of middlewares allow you to control your workflow as with Plack/Rack/WSGI. You can easily imagine doing this:
- check if the request has already been made and cached
- return the response if the cache is still valid
- perform the request
- send the content to a remote storer in raw format
- cache the raw data locally
- deserialize to json
- remove some data from the response
- give the response to the client
Or to interrogate a site as an API:
- send a request on a web page
- pass the response to a scraper, and put the data in JSON
- return the JSON with scraped data to the client
## Creating a repository on GitHub
In this example, we use a middleware to authenticate on the GitHub API:
``` perl
use Config::GitLike;
use Net::HTTP::Spore;
my $c = Config::GitLike::Git->new(); $c->load;
my $login = $c->get(key => 'github.user');
my $token = $c->get(key => 'github.token');
my $github = Net::HTTP::Spore->new_from_spec('github.json');
$github->enable('Format::JSON');
$github->enable(
'Auth::Basic',
username => $login . '/token',
password => $token,
);
my $res = $github->create_repo(
format => 'json',
payload => {name => $name, description => $desc}
);
```
The middleware Auth::Basic will add the **authorization** header to the request, using the given tokens.
**\*** SPORE + MooseX::Role::Parameterized
I really like [MooseX::Role::Parameterized](http://search.cpan.org/perldoc?MooseX::Role::Parameterized). This module allows you to build dynamically a Role to apply to your class/object:
``` perl
package My::App::Role::SPORE;
use MooseX::Role::Parameterized;
use Net::HTTP::Spore;
parameter name => ( isa => 'Str', required => 1, );
role {
my $p = shift;
my $name = $p->name;
has $name => (
is => 'rw',
isa => 'Object',
lazy => 1,
default => sub {
my $self = shift;
my $client_config = $self->context->{spore}->{$name};
my $client = Net::HTTP::Spore->new_from_spec(
$client_config->{spec},
%{ $client_config->{options}},
);
foreach my $mw ( @{ $client_config->{middlewares} } ) {
$client->enable($mw);
}
},
);
};
1;
# in your app
package My::App;
use Moose;
with 'My::App::Role::SPORE' => { name => 'couchdb' },
'My::App::Role::SPORE' => { name => 'url_solver' };
1;
```
This Role will add two new attributes to my class: **couchdb** and **url\_solver**, reading from a config file a list of middlewares to apply and the options (like base\_uri).
## Testing my application that uses CouchDB
This is a common case. In your application you use CouchDB to store some information. When you run the tests for this application, you don't know if there will be a couchdb running on the host, if it will be on the default port, on what database should you do your tests, ...
The Perl implementation of SPORE comes with a Mock middleware:
``` perl
package myapp;
use Moose;
has couchdb_client => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Object');
use Test::More;
use JSON;
use myapp;
use Net::HTTP::Spore;
my $content = { title => "blog post", website => "http://lumberjaph.net" };
my $mock_server = {
'/test_database/1234' => sub {
my $req = shift;
$req->new_response(
200,
[ 'Content-Type' => 'application/json' ],
JSON::encode_json($content)
);
},
};
ok my $client =
Net::HTTP::Spore->new_from_spec(
'/home/franck/code/projects/spore/specifications/apps/couchdb.json',
base_url => 'http://localhost:5984' );
$client->enable('Format::JSON');
$client->enable( 'Mock', tests => $mock_server );
my $app = myapp->new(couchdb_client => $client);
my $res =
$app->client->get_document( database => 'test_database', doc_id => '1234' );
is $res->[0], 200;
is_deeply $res->[2], $content;
is $res->header('Content-Type'), 'application/json';
done_testing;
```
The middleware catches the request, checks if it matches something defined by the user and returns a response.
## So ...
I really see SPORE as something Perlish: a glue. The various implementations are a nice addition, and I'm happy to see some suggestions and discussions about the specifications.
I'm pretty confident that the current specification for the API description is stable at this point. We still need to write more middlewares to see if we can cover most of the usages easily, so we can decide if the specification for the implementation is valid.
(as always, thanks to bl0b!).
|